<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Can Government Work With Philanthropy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bradrourke.com/2009/08/13/how-can-government-work-with-philanthropy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bradrourke.com/2009/08/13/how-can-government-work-with-philanthropy/</link>
	<description>Thoughts for leaders where new media meets public life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Ziskind</title>
		<link>http://blog.bradrourke.com/2009/08/13/how-can-government-work-with-philanthropy/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Ziskind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bradrourke.com/?p=1367#comment-316</guid>
		<description>Oops, your blog doesn&#039;t like &#039;cut and paste&#039;. Alright then, here&#039;s the quote about GM: &quot;G.M. executives found out just how far the company had fallen on Monday when more than 100 consumers - some of them vocal critics of the company - were invited to test their latest products. The event, held at G.M.&#039;s proving grounds outside of Detroit, was as humbling for some executives as the months of debate over the company&#039;s federal bailout. &quot;I learned a lot,&quot; said Fritz Henderson, who became G.M.&#039;s chief executive in April. The awareness of our products was painfully, almost pitifully low.&quot;

The quote from Katz, was the second bullet from the recap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, your blog doesn&#8217;t like &#8216;cut and paste&#8217;. Alright then, here&#8217;s the quote about GM: &#8220;G.M. executives found out just how far the company had fallen on Monday when more than 100 consumers &#8211; some of them vocal critics of the company &#8211; were invited to test their latest products. The event, held at G.M.&#8217;s proving grounds outside of Detroit, was as humbling for some executives as the months of debate over the company&#8217;s federal bailout. &#8220;I learned a lot,&#8221; said Fritz Henderson, who became G.M.&#8217;s chief executive in April. The awareness of our products was painfully, almost pitifully low.&#8221;</p>
<p>The quote from Katz, was the second bullet from the recap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Ziskind</title>
		<link>http://blog.bradrourke.com/2009/08/13/how-can-government-work-with-philanthropy/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Ziskind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bradrourke.com/?p=1367#comment-315</guid>
		<description>Thought provoking post, Brad. It&#039;s something I hadn&#039;t thought about, but I like your line of reasoning. In fact, one of Katz&#039;s comments made me think of an article about GM in yesterday&#039;s times with quote that indicated a similarly insular operation:

&lt;&gt;

So the company went through how many CEOs before it stumbled on one who thought, &quot;Gosh, I wonder what the people who drive our product are thinking?&quot; Katz &amp; the government seem to have donned similar blinders. &lt;&gt;

Someone might want to point out to Katz that words like &#039;integrated&#039; and &#039;collaboration&#039; don&#039;t mesh with &#039;cascade down&#039;. There is a world of doers and best practices out there and they&#039;re all talking to each other in the online meta-community. Like GM, it&#039;s high time the government joined the conversation. And it&#039;s not like it&#039;s logistically impossible. I believe we just elected a president using that very tactic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought provoking post, Brad. It&#8217;s something I hadn&#8217;t thought about, but I like your line of reasoning. In fact, one of Katz&#8217;s comments made me think of an article about GM in yesterday&#8217;s times with quote that indicated a similarly insular operation:</p>
<p>&lt;&gt;</p>
<p>So the company went through how many CEOs before it stumbled on one who thought, &#8220;Gosh, I wonder what the people who drive our product are thinking?&#8221; Katz &amp; the government seem to have donned similar blinders. &lt;&gt;</p>
<p>Someone might want to point out to Katz that words like &#8216;integrated&#8217; and &#8216;collaboration&#8217; don&#8217;t mesh with &#8216;cascade down&#8217;. There is a world of doers and best practices out there and they&#8217;re all talking to each other in the online meta-community. Like GM, it&#8217;s high time the government joined the conversation. And it&#8217;s not like it&#8217;s logistically impossible. I believe we just elected a president using that very tactic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

